Category: General Blogs
Category: General Blogs
This column’s headline may sound a bit odd. After all, if any part of a beverage is hard to overlook, it’s got to be the package. But it’s not consumers who are overlooking packaging, apparently, it’s marketers, who aren’t making it a priority, and are really hurting their brands as a result.
These are the findings of a new study on the impact of beverage packaging by the global marketing technology company Affinnova.
At Beverage World, we have been thinking a lot about packaging lately, so this seemed like the perfect time to discuss the results of this study. Between this issue and the November issue, we present three major sections on packaging, In this issue you will find The Future of Packaging beginning on page 51. You’ll also find our in-depth preview of the Pack Expo show beginning on page 66. I’m also very excited about the winners of our 2014 Global Packaging Design Awards, which will be announced in the November issue. I’ve already seen the winners and I can assure you they are quite impressive indeed.
But let’s get back to the Affinnova study. Titled “Packaging Design Trend Watch—The Beverage Aisle,” it used Affinnova’s Design Audit technology to analyze the packaging in the water enhancer, energy drink, flavored sparkling water, flavored enhanced water and sparkling fruit juice categories. Designs were measured on their ability to grab and hold consumer attention, strengthen consumer brand perceptions and help convert consumers to purchase.
The study discovered that in the energy drink category, relatively newer brands—NOS and AMP—have struggled to gain share against Red Bull and Monster, despite the distribution and advertising muscle of their parent companies, Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Affinnova’s study suggests that inferior package designs by NOS and AMP are primarily to blame: they fail to attract consumers’ attention or drive purchase at shelf. However, in the sparkling water category, recent entrant Sparkling ICE used effective package design to overcome limited distribution and advertising support, beating out long-established category leaders such as Perrier.
In short, package design is a powerful driver of a product’s success or failure. Says Waleed Al-Atraqchi, President and CEO of Affinnova, “Package design is the least expensive and most essential part of the marketing mix, helping to drive trial, repeat purchase and brand equity—yet it only gets a fraction of the attention that advertising or promotion receive. Brands that put energy into creating strong package designs gain a tremendous competitive advantage.”
Among the study’s other findings: Exceptional package design helped Minute Maid overcome a late start in the liquid enhancer category; products like Starbucks Refreshers have gained ground by using package design to attract consumers who seek softer, less macho brand qualities, and Glaceau Vitaminwater trailed Pepsi’s Sobe Lifewater when it came to grabbing consumers’ attention and driving brand equity through package design.
The study was conducted in April 2014 and involved 5,000 U.S. consumers—and there’s a lot more information from it, which can all be accessed at affinnova.com/beverageaisle.
Category: General Blogs
We are now accepting entries for the 2014 Global Packaging Design Awards. The awards recognize the best in beverage packaging design from around the world. They are open to any packages introduced since Sept. 1, 2013. Deadline for entries is August 15th. Winners will be notified by Oct. 1st and will also be featured in the November 2014 edition of Beverage World. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for details on how to enter.
So we are supposed to believe that suddenly the entire world is shunning a refreshing Pepsi or Coke because they have a lot of calories, but can’t wait to get their hands on a Subway sandwich filled with Fritos, or an indulgent new nachos you can gobble up on the go from Taco Bell?
Which is it, because, at least in my mind, the two trends seem to be telling me two things at once—and this is driving me slowly crazy!
Are we really seeing consumers the world over suddenly turn against carbonated soft drinks, or is there something else going on here?
Activist investor Nelson Peltz believes it’s the latter. He would like to see PepsiCo split into two parts: one for its food business, the other for its beverages. And he wants this not because he thinks the beverage part of the business would then slither away into a corner and die like some zombie from “The Walking Dead,” but because he believes it would then be able to thrive under a more “focused leadership.”
I’m inclined to agree with him. And this is despite the synergies “The Power of One” — where PepsiCo’s food and beverages have been used together in some powerful promotions—have brought to PepsiCo. The reason is that in this day and age—“The Age of Creative Disruption”—it’s not hard to see why more intense focus can only benefit a beverage business.
I’m writing this, after all, in the days following the announcement that Comcast plans to buy out Time Warner. And the news just broke that Netlfix is paying Comcast to ensure its pipeline into homes remains free of disruption by the increasingly powerful Comcast. And NBC just noticed how a vast number of its audience turned to their iPads, mobile phone and computers, instead of their TV’s, to watch the Olympics live. And I can go on and on...
Talk about creative disruption!
Our industry’s “creative disruption” can be seen in the interest in the handcrafted and the local over the distant and impersonal. It’s in the craft beer renaissance, where small brewers are giving entrenched global brands a run for their money. Case in point: I recently dined out at a newly opened gastropub in my Queens, N.Y. neighborhood and was able to savor the pub’s new house beer, brewed by the nearby, and newly opened, Queens Brewery. You can’t get much more local than that.
And that’s just beer. We haven’t even touched on the increasing number of new functional beverages—everything from beautifying drinks, to drinks that help you think better, sleep better, or stay alert longer. Or how about the premiumization of just about everything? Think Starbucks’ experimentation with handcrafted sodas.
So it may be that the pickle CSD finds itself in today isn’t so much about consumers running away from high-calorie sodas (as the mainstream media loves to so dramatically describe it) as it is about them just enjoying all the new choices they have.
Beverage companies that can focus 100 percent on navigating their way through all the new opportunities created by this creative disruption probably have a big advantage going forward.